With the UK general election behind us - and rent controls off the
agenda in England - activity is picking up again in the market. There is more
investment coming in and more competition. Those investors who are only willing
or only able to invest in standing stock are going to find it increasingly
difficult to access the PRS market on the sizeable scale that institutions
want.
There is a solution - to create such stock by partnering with
developers, government-backed entities, local authorities, housing associations
or housebuilders. Historically, institutional investors haven’t had much of a
relationship with housebuilders (except, perhaps, as shareholders), but in the
brave new world of private rented residential, such a partnership makes a lot
of sense.
For housebuilders, one advantage of PRS is that homes can be let
much faster than they can be sold. People can move in more quickly, bringing
life and vitality into the whole development. That in turn creates a sense of
place and community, helping drive commercial activity (restaurants, cafés,
shops) and potentially boosting the appeal of those areas of the scheme that
are reserved for the homeowner market.
Traditionally, housebuilders have opted for large schemes and then
parcelled off bits of land to sell to their rivals to help fund the project.
While the different housebuilders would offer different products, this still
created competition as all the homes were ultimately up for sale to homeowners.
By partnering with a PRS investor instead, housebuilders can avoid such
competition, while securing investment that will ultimately help them build
more homes.
For the institutional investor, meanwhile, the key advantage of
such a partnership is access to a pipeline of assets at a time when there is a
very limited amount of large-scale, ready-built quality sustainable stock
available to purchase. Development does come with a degree of risk, but this
can be significantly reduced by checking the covenants of the developer and the
construction firm, as well as by working with counterparties on fixed-price
contracts backed up by various guarantees and warranties. Getting involved in
the development stage can also provide the opportunity to influence the design
and ensure the building is tailor-made for rent.
Of course, the drivers of the rental market can vary from those of
the for-sale segment, so it is vital to assess the merits of each individual
opportunity and its capacity to deliver the kind of income-driven, long-term
returns demanded by institutional investors.
For example, we recently invested in a scheme in Bath Riverside.
The partnership with the housebuilder, Crest Nicholson, was important, but
location was also key. Bath is a world heritage site, so building activity is
strictly limited and the city therefore suffers on the supply side, much like
London. Demand, meanwhile, is strong with high levels of employment fuelled by
two universities and a thriving tourism industry. The location is set to become
yet more attractive with the electrification of the train line, which will cut
down the journey time to London to around an hour. Together, those factors mean
that the long-term forecast for rental growth is strong, which makes it an
attractive investment for institutions.
So, ‘location, location, location’ remains a very important mantra
in resi. But ‘development, development, development’ is also key. By partnering
with housebuilders, developers and others, we can help meet the growing demand
for housing in the UK and develop a world-class private rented sector.